Mortal Shell II vs Nioh 3

Both are punishing action-RPGs, but Mortal Shell II asks you to gamble on an unpatched open world while Nioh 3 bets on 27 hours of refined stance combat.

Updated 3d ago

Mortal Shell II cover
Mortal Shell II 8.3/10 Strong

Mortal Shell II nails crunchy, weighty combat with the Shell-class system — but wait for the bug fixes if you're not already a Souls vet.

Nioh 3 cover
Nioh 3 8.5/10 Strong

Punches above its sequel weight — Nioh 3's Samurai/Ninja stance system is Team Ninja's sharpest combat to date, despite empty-zone pacing.

By the numbers

Prices checked Sep 11; they move faster than we refresh, so confirm on the store page.

Recent-review figures are Steam's own last-30-days window, read Sep 11.

Measure Mortal Shell II Nioh 3
Value Nioh 3 wins on value
Price now $49.99 Steam $33.95 −51% · GameBillet
All-time low $49.99 $33.95
Cost / hour $1.25/hr $33.95 · 27 h main story
Off its low At its low low was Jul 2026 At its low low was Sep 2026
Main story 27 h
Health
Steam reviews 79% 20k reviews 78% 19k reviews
Recent reviews improving trend only 57% 317 votes · vs 78% lifetime · souring
Peak players 27,995 Aug 2026 10,863 Aug 2026 · ↑ 377% MoM
Launch peak 12% of Feb 2026 launch peak · as of Aug 2026
All-time peak 87,778 Feb 2026
Support
Last patch 8 days ago 6 days ago
Patch cadence 3 in last 90 days 4 in last 90 days
Steam Deck Gold Gold

Shared scale — same months across the bottom, same player-count axis up the side, so the two lines are directly comparable. A shorter line means a younger game.

Mortal Shell II
Only one month of data so far — the line fills in over time.
Aug 2026
Nioh 3
Feb 2026 – Aug 2026

What players say

Patterns from long-haul reviewers, taken from each game's verdict. Not live sentiment — each side is dated below.

Mortal Shell II

Love

Crunchy, weighty combat with distinct Shell playstyles is what keeps 100-hour fans hooked, with every weapon and sidearm offering a different build.

Struggle with

Game-breaking bugs and hitbox inconsistencies are the friction that erodes trust for the 60+ hour crowd, especially in endgame bosses.

from our September 2026 verdict

Nioh 3

Love

Build flexibility between ninja and samurai stances without rerolling is the combat loop 100-hour veterans praise, alongside polished Team Ninja action.

Struggle with

The open world structure, described as a big mission map with collectibles, is the friction that long-time Nioh fans flag as a step back.

from our May 2026 verdict

Key differences

Technical stability
Mortal Shell II still has game-breaking bugs and magnetic hitboxes, with only 3 patches in 90 days to fix them.
Nioh 3 has shipped 4 patches in the same window and its 78% positive Steam reviews reflect fewer run-ending failures.
Combat identity
Shell-class possession and weighty, adrenaline-charged swings define Cold Symmetry's sequel, at the cost of inconsistent Shell abilities.
Team Ninja's Samurai/Ninja stance system is called its sharpest combat yet, though empty-zone pacing interrupts the flow.
Content shape
Mortal Shell II favors free exploration in a compact, interconnected world and warns against expecting boss variety across 40+ hours.
Nioh 3 stretches a 27-hour main story across open fields with mid-bosses that one-shot you for 30 hours, at $1–2 per hour.

Which one is for you?

Pick Mortal Shell II if

  • You played the first Mortal Shell and want a shorter, tighter follow-up.
  • You love Sekiro's parry focus and want a Dark Souls-style world around it.
  • Soulslike retry loops energize you instead of wearing you down.

Pick Nioh 3 if

  • You loved Nioh 2's stance-shifting combat and want it in open-field traversal.
  • You can tolerate mid-bosses one-shotting you for 30 hours.
  • You own a PC or PS5 with steady 60fps headroom for parry-window timing.

Bottom line

Pick Nioh 3 if you want Team Ninja's sharpest stance combat backed by 4 patches and a 27-hour main story; pick Mortal Shell II only if you already finished the first game and accept its bug risk for a compact world.

More comparisons

Browse every comparison →